exploring inter-subjective encounters, exchange and ties.
two participants engaged (maybe reactional, mutual, exchange ) for the duration to disengage at the end of a participating relationship.
20090513
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
exploring inter-subjective encounters, exchange and ties.
two participants engaged (maybe reactional, mutual, exchange ) for the duration to disengage at the end of a participating relationship.
Thank you for explaining life to me tonight-have I really missed that point for so long?
ReplyDeleteWhich point..did I
ReplyDelete?
not-relevant-but(two people in vid above got engaged in marital sense 5years ago and then disengaged.)
ReplyDeletehow odd.
Its not a game...we just have to adapt to every situation we find ourselves in...(this must be normality- what everyone does and I can't do most of the time-odd odd odd)
ReplyDelete..with adaptation links to change being the only concrete constant in our lives./
ReplyDeletewithout adaptation
we are
?stuck
A degree is not a game. It has boundaries and constructs like every other system. \outside the boundaries is not freedom, freedom might be a thwarted ideal of whats outside the boundaries.
I think that breaking and unacceptance of boundaries might show someone struggling to remain within them??
I think that straight-line-limits can peak at a curve if you want them to be. Its impossible to break them, if i broke degree limits, I wouldnt be doing a degree. I'd have work/benefits/death boundaries! eh. I didnt get what you were meaning earlier. Im sorry.
every relationship is some kind of engagement
ReplyDeleteYip - could be degrees/education boundaries hold us back?
ReplyDeleteAnother hypothesis.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteoh dear.
ReplyDeleteim going to watch some twin peaks and catch some zz's. posh vodka's taken over and im obviously not making sense
hope youre ok away from a clinical blog.