im blank.
...does there have to be a blurb to explain the work?
-hypothesis>....yes this is a HE course get over it
Skinners motivational theory - i am not inspired to write this synopsis because past similar activities (chores) have not induced pleasure. Im not happy with explaining/contextualising/researching my work within the institutional constructs of a scholarly essay... (structuralism/post structuralism link)
Toni's nearly finished hers and said my advice worked; to use the essay as an opportunity for growth, fun and exploration. time to take own advice.
It involves listening to loud punk music..wahey
Ok heres first draft..DEVELOPMENTAL RESEARCH SYNOPSIS
I am going to explore and break down relevant theories and debates that relate to my art practice to be able to formulate a statement that expresses my personal philosophy and underpins my work.
My work is about finding and exploring something fresh and alive. It is focused around a planned act or chemistry of a moment that can only be experienced by those present at the site. Photography is used to document the work.
My work is constantly changing theoretically and therefore visually, I am a de-centred practitioner working on multiple themes with an indistinct style running through all of my work. I am constantly journeying, understanding, testing and hypothesizing concepts whilst, running parrallel, am attempting to express a concept relatively and objectively.
I appreciate the controversial, innovative and ritualistic performances of Joseph Beuys and will investigate Beuys essays, ‘Not just a few are called, but everyone,’ and ‘I am searching for Field Vision.’ Strangely, Beuys created his public persona from fact and fiction, this self-appointed personal stance thread takes some of the objectivity away from the viewer. Yet this subjectivity may have been a prerequisite to his further works, in a similar way to my semester 3 (which in hindsight are art as therapy) creations. Art Theorist, Benjamin Buchloh criticises Beuys retreat into myths and symbolism and criticises Beuys’ rhetoric, calling it, ‘simple minded, utopian drivel’. I will take into account Rosalind Krauss’s writings on Beuys and link this to my work.
Following the above, I see myself as having re-accessed art at the beginning of Semester 4. Although absorbing and participating in Semester 3, my creations and thoughts were within the ‘art as therapy’ bracket, which was necessary at that time. I had to test the limits of art as therapy in a similar way to testing painting and printmaking as an artform to be able to put them to rest and to move on. I have rejected pretty pictures.I am interested in art being a way of life and how much art and life can infringe and harmonise with each other. This links with ideological political philosophies that I feel in the right place to be able to realise, encourage, disentangle and reformulate.
My current main project is creating public dens that are habitable yet initially uninhabited. The aesthetic is predetermined by the site and by the found objects used to create the den and the control is a piece of vintage fabric, usually used for the dens roof. The touch of intention upon initialising this project was to change spaces and integrate these spaces into the environment, with intention to leave the dens after initial creation to be evolved, de-created or untouched by the public, institution workers and nature.
I am interested in what happens to the dens post-creation and am going to attempt summarising this with reference to Barthes essay, ‘From work to text.’
now i just need to clean that up and add images..